buy microsoft word mac buying outlook 2010 online buy autosketch 10 how much does archicad 12 cost camtasia studio 7 best price buy symantec ghost solutions suite buy adobe photoshop elements 8 where to buy outlook express cheapest ms office professional cheap windows server 2003 backup discount adobe acrobat mac buy office 2003 pro buy windows 7 as a student buy nero 6 buy home designer suite
    buy cheap adobe audition 3 purchase nero 9 download purchase microsoft word 2008 buy navicat premium buy quicken in uk purchase autocad 2007 purchase captivate buy stellar phoenix outlook pst repair buy bento 3 australia cheap 3ds max 8 purchase office 2007 student best price corel draw x3 buy windows xp student edition buy excel 2011 buy adobe creative suite cs4 web premium

Flip-flop by Rendell gives hope to wineries

Earlier we noted that Pennsylvania Governor Rendell opposed direct wine shipments because they would increase the chance that minors receive alcohol. After taking a lot of heat for that “colossal lie”, Rendell changed his tune and is now saying that it’s all about state revenue. “The Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, which manages the state’s 640 liquor stores, generated $373.6 million in taxes and profits on $1.5 billion in sales during fiscal 2004-05.” That is 25% of sales.

Rendell is concerned about “slippage”, or lost revenues from wineries that might not report and pay taxes on shipments made directly to consumers. But this issue has been addressed by a number of different states, including New York, Connecticut, and Texas. States can require wineries to obtain a permit for direct shipping and can also charge a permit fee. They can collect excise taxes and sales taxes as they see fit and require wineries to report every shipment that they make into the state. They can even require the common carriers to get a copy of the direct shippping permit from each winery, collect an adult signature on delivery and report all shipments that they make from every winery, listing the permit number. The state can revoke the direct shipping permit of any winery in violation of the rules.

New Hampshire, New York, Connecticut, and Texas have proven that allowing direct shipments while preventing the sale of alcohol to minors and gaining revenue in the process are not mutually exclusive concepts.
Read more about PA here.

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>