ibuprofen générique pas cher clomiphene zyban sans recette achat clomid en france acheter doxycycline online flagyl 125mg actos sans recette commande orlistat augmentin sur le comptoir commande nexium commande zyprexa acheter naltrexone en ligne aldactone pharmacie zyrtec sans ordonnance pas cher lamisil
acheter cialis générique achat viagra france achat viagra en ligne en france forum vente viagra ligne achat bviagra bpharmacie viagra prescription médicale tarif viagra en pharmacie acheter du cialis viagra france forum kamagra viagra e bstore.biz tarif levitra viapharmacy cialis generique 10 commander cialis generique

Flip-flop by Rendell gives hope to wineries

Earlier we noted that Pennsylvania Governor Rendell opposed direct wine shipments because they would increase the chance that minors receive alcohol. After taking a lot of heat for that “colossal lie”, Rendell changed his tune and is now saying that it’s all about state revenue. “The Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, which manages the state’s 640 liquor stores, generated $373.6 million in taxes and profits on $1.5 billion in sales during fiscal 2004-05.” That is 25% of sales.

Rendell is concerned about “slippage”, or lost revenues from wineries that might not report and pay taxes on shipments made directly to consumers. But this issue has been addressed by a number of different states, including New York, Connecticut, and Texas. States can require wineries to obtain a permit for direct shipping and can also charge a permit fee. They can collect excise taxes and sales taxes as they see fit and require wineries to report every shipment that they make into the state. They can even require the common carriers to get a copy of the direct shippping permit from each winery, collect an adult signature on delivery and report all shipments that they make from every winery, listing the permit number. The state can revoke the direct shipping permit of any winery in violation of the rules.

New Hampshire, New York, Connecticut, and Texas have proven that allowing direct shipments while preventing the sale of alcohol to minors and gaining revenue in the process are not mutually exclusive concepts.
Read more about PA here.

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>