<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Setback in Maine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shipcompliantblog.com/blog/2006/03/07/setback-in-maine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shipcompliantblog.com/blog/2006/03/07/setback-in-maine/</link>
	<description>Untangling the complex world of wine direct shipping and compliance</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 22:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark McKinley</title>
		<link>http://shipcompliantblog.com/blog/2006/03/07/setback-in-maine/#comment-38195</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark McKinley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 17:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shipcompliantblog.com/blog/?p=63#comment-38195</guid>
		<description>What about the U.S. Supreme Court ruling on 2/20/08 in Maine for tobacco?  The shipping companies (UPS &#38; Fedex) are now exempt from enforcing or being responsible state laws to tobacco shipments.  The carriers no longer need to be burdened on different state laws with tobacco.  How does this relate with wine shipments?  This could help the wine shipments correct?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about the U.S. Supreme Court ruling on 2/20/08 in Maine for tobacco?  The shipping companies (UPS &amp; Fedex) are now exempt from enforcing or being responsible state laws to tobacco shipments.  The carriers no longer need to be burdened on different state laws with tobacco.  How does this relate with wine shipments?  This could help the wine shipments correct?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
