amoxicillin usa 
buy lasix online usa 
allergic reaction amoxicillin 
buy champix online usa clomid pct dosage prohormone clomid 50mg price in india
buy excel 2004 mac download microsoft powerpoint mac trial silver efex pro 2 lowest price
  • download microsoft excel mac buy and download windows 7 oem download coreldraw
  • viagra kopen utrecht tadalis sx 20 mg acheter cialis 5mg en france
  • cialis danmark exemple ordonnance viagra viagra sécurité sociale
  • viagras en pharmacie viagra zu verkaufen cialis generico da mg

    Landmark ruling in Costco vs. Hoen

    On Friday, Judge Marsha Pechman released Findings of Fact and Conclusion in the case of Costco v. Hoen. In a landmark ruling for the future of the three tier system, the Court found that the Washington state-mandated wholesaler monopoly was not shielded by the 21st Amendment and was in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act.

    After the dust settles, this will likely create a ripple effect not unlike the the Granholm v. Heald ruling of 2005. For now, Judge Pechman stayed the judgement for the 30 days to give the defendants time to appeal.

    We’ll have much more to say about this in the coming days and weeks.

    Late Update: OK, I just read this and could not pass it up. Check out this quote from Tom Wark at Fermentation:

    It will be interesting to see if any wine wholesalers issue any sort of statement. It will be even more interesting if the reactionary national association for wholesalers, Wine & Spirit Wholesalers Association (WSWA), releases a statement. I can see it now:

    “we are disappointed that the judge did not respect the clear message of the 21st Amendment and blah blah blah blah…”

    Wouldn’t it be nice if the WSWA instead issued a statement that made sense and was honest:

    “Our rationale for trying to restrict sales and deprive consumers of choice in the realm of wine has been exploded in a perfectly reasonable ruling by the judge. We have no leg to stand on now and will work closely with state legislatures across the country to liberalize wine sales with the hope that consumers will now be able to obtain the wines they want unfettered by our desire to maintain a state-sponsored monopoly.”

    Trackbacks/Pingbacks

    1. The WITS Blog » eSkye: National Wine Industry Implications of Costcos Legal Victory - [...] A few posts worth viewing: Seattle PI article Tricia Colliane’s Blog Wine Direct Shipping Compliance Blog Wine and Spirits …
    2. The WITS Blog » eSkye: National Wine Industry Implications of Costco’s Legal Victory - [...] A few posts worth viewing: Seattle PI article Tricia Colliane’s Blog Wine Direct Shipping Compliance Blog Wine and Spirits …
    3. A setback for Costco - ShipCompliant - [...] yesterday in the case of Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Hoen. The panel largely reversed the April, 2006 decision that …
    4. Washington Liquor Control Board to appeal Costco ruling - ShipCompliant - [...] Washington State Liquor Control Board announced yesterday it will appeal the ruling issued by Judge Marsha Pechman. The state …

    Submit a Comment

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

    banner-promo-ewinery2