<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HB 247 passes Florida House</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shipcompliantblog.com/blog/2006/04/28/hb-247-passes-florida-house/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shipcompliantblog.com/blog/2006/04/28/hb-247-passes-florida-house/</link>
	<description>Untangling the complex world of wine direct shipping and compliance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 16:58:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Carroll</title>
		<link>http://shipcompliantblog.com/blog/2006/04/28/hb-247-passes-florida-house/comment-page-1/#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Carroll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2006 22:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shipcompliantblog.com/blog/?p=85#comment-96</guid>
		<description>Thanks Tom, good catch. I corrected the typo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Tom, good catch. I corrected the typo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom merle</title>
		<link>http://shipcompliantblog.com/blog/2006/04/28/hb-247-passes-florida-house/comment-page-1/#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>tom merle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2006 15:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shipcompliantblog.com/blog/?p=85#comment-94</guid>
		<description>Another excellent overview, Jeff.  Small typo, however, which gives the oppositie impression. &quot;A separate bill (SB 282) that does include a production cap is ready for floor&quot;  Should be does ~not~ include.
 
Keep up the great coverage.  The industry depends on your &quot;explication des textes&quot;.

TOM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another excellent overview, Jeff.  Small typo, however, which gives the oppositie impression. &#8220;A separate bill (SB 282) that does include a production cap is ready for floor&#8221;  Should be does ~not~ include.</p>
<p>Keep up the great coverage.  The industry depends on your &#8220;explication des textes&#8221;.</p>
<p>TOM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
