purchase 3ds max 2009 cheap microsoft office home and student 2010 microsoft office outlook 2007 price purchase 2007 microsoft powerpoint microsoft windows 7 academic discount buy windows 2003 datacenter rosetta stone hebrew used buy microsoft word 2007 key adobe photoshop cs4 best price cheap rosetta stone mac buying windows server 2008 australia cheap adobe photoshop cs4 for mac buying photoshop cs3 mac buy adobe cs2 package where can i buy rosetta stone spanish
discount windows xp pro 64 bit purchase photoshop cs2 download cheap adobe creative suite 4 design buying word 2007 download purchase symantec ghost silver efex pro discount cheap windows 7 full edition purchase windows seven enterprise cheap windows xp uk discount lightroom for teachers buy office publisher 2003 buy microsoft office 2013 online buying ms word online buy adobe after effects 6 price of office 2008 for mac

Ohio adopts restrictive permit system

On June 30th, Ohio Governor Ted Strickland signed the fiscal year 2008-09 budget bill. Similar to the current legislative maneuvering in Wisconsin, this was an unusual development to see wine shipping provisions inserted into a state budget bill. As we reported earlier, the law changes Ohio’s court ordered open status for shipping wines to a limited/direct permit shipping state.

This bill presents a number of issues. First, the capacity cap restricts wineries that produce more than 150,000 gallons (roughly 63,000 cases) annually from receiving a permit. Additionally, the following sentence in the bill has everyone scratching their heads.

Sec. 4303.233. No family household shall purchase more than twenty-four cases of nine-liter bottles of wine in one year.

What exactly does “family household” mean? Did they really mean to say “nine-liter bottles”? I don’t think that any family in Ohio would ever really purchase twenty-four Salmanazars in one year, but how would one convert that into standard 750 mL bottles? Is this a Massachusetts/Indiana-style volume limit where the limit applies to the household across all wineries? If so, how could a winery in California possibly know how much volume has shipped to their Ohio customers from other wineries across the country? Finally, does one year mean one calendar year or any rolling 365 day period? Hopefully Ohio will answer all of these questions very clearly. If they don’t, most will likely choose not to ship to Ohio given the uncertainty around shipping the 25th “case”.

The new law is set to take effect 90 days after being signed, in this case September 28th, but the Division of Liquor Control may push this to October 1st. Stay tuned for more information once Ohio promulgates or clarifies these rules.

2 Comments

  1. It seems pretty clear that they have simply converted milliters to liters. So one case =
    12×750 ml = 9 liters.

  2. This bill pased through so quietly there are people in the wine industry who were not even aware that it was in the legislature. It is to bad in this day and age that big business always wins. This whole isssue is about the wholesale distrubutors want to keep all the profits and letting the hard working small business people go under. I wish we could all just stop buying through the wholesalers but that’s impossible. So just remember to support your local vineyards as much as possible. AND at every opportunity voice your opinon about the close mined money hungry wholesalers who obviously contribute very very well to their politcians. And buy before October 1st.

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>