<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Georgia Direct Shipper Application Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shipcompliantblog.com/blog/2008/06/13/georgia-direct-shipper-application-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shipcompliantblog.com/blog/2008/06/13/georgia-direct-shipper-application-update/</link>
	<description>Untangling the complex world of wine direct shipping and compliance</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 09:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Annette Gutierrez</title>
		<link>http://shipcompliantblog.com/blog/2008/06/13/georgia-direct-shipper-application-update/#comment-47480</link>
		<dc:creator>Annette Gutierrez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 22:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shipcompliantblog.com/blog/?p=306#comment-47480</guid>
		<description>Hi Annie,

I'm wondering why we can't even ship onsite shipments without this permit. If a state decides not to get a permit to direct ship then they should be able to ship onsite shipments. What's the point of specifying if it was onsite or not if we have to have a permit anyway? What about online orders? Would this also require a permit? 

Annette</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Annie,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m wondering why we can&#8217;t even ship onsite shipments without this permit. If a state decides not to get a permit to direct ship then they should be able to ship onsite shipments. What&#8217;s the point of specifying if it was onsite or not if we have to have a permit anyway? What about online orders? Would this also require a permit? </p>
<p>Annette</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
