Untangling the complex world of wine direct shipping and compliance
propecia belgique pas cher tadalafil acheter ketoconazole en ligne acheter priligy online risperdal sans recette zyban prix bactrim mg duphaston sans ordonnance aciclovir mg augmentin sans recette
buy finasteride 
buy kamagra mc 
kamagra online pharmacy 
cialis online low cost 
viagra where to buy 
buy viagra online usa 
buy champix online no prescription 
kamagra otc 
buy cialis generic 
cialis india pharmacy 

Up and Running (So Far)

December 19th, 2008
By R. Corbin Houchins, Beverage Industry Counsel

Happily for the plaintiffs, Judge Zobel’s final judgment in Family Winemakers of California v. Jenkins took the path that seemed most likely from the tone and content of her memorandum and order of 19 November 2008 and leveled up. The judgment entered 18 December 2008 orders the state “to permit wineries of all sizes to apply for licenses under Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 138, § 19F(b),” which does not contain the § 19F(a) disqualification of wineries that have sold to a Massachusetts wholesaler within six months of applying for the license, formerly applicable to all 30,000-gallon-and-over wineries. In her November opinion, the judge had noted that the “choice” to use direct shipment only after abandoning all sales through wholesalers for six months was, in effect, prohibition.

Final judgment does not settle the issue of a possible stay of the injunction pending appeal. The state has 30 days from entry of the judgment to file notice of appeal, which would be a prerequisite to moving for a stay in the trial court and, if unsuccessful there, in the Court of Appeals.

By R. Corbin Houchins, Attorney at Law

Leave a Reply