purchase filemaker pro 8 purchase windows xp sp2 oem buying flash cs3 buy adobe acrobat 9 mac vmware fusion discount where can i buy ms office 2003 microsoft streets and trips 2011 best price best price powerpoint 2007 buy expression web 2 upgrade buy outlook 2000 best price ilife 09 buy camtasia studio 4 purchase 2007 microsoft office online how to purchase windows 7 enterprise edition best price photoshop cs3 mac
purchase acrobat pro mac buy windows server 2008 activation key where to buy cyberlink powerdirector cheap microsoft office access 2007 best buy windows xp pro sp3 buy autocad for mac uk buy autodesk autocad buy adobe creative suite 3 master cheapest office 2013 windows buy adobe premiere pro cs4 cheap microsoft publisher software best price autosketch dragon naturally speaking discount code best price photoshop 6 buy solidworks 2009 cheap

Siesta’s Over

On January 26th, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ended the puzzling status of interstate retailing in Texas created by the lower court’s decision in Siesta Village Market. The district court had ruled that out-of-state retailers had a Commerce Clause right to sell wine to Texas consumers, but only wine that had been purchased from a Texas-licensed wholesaler.

The decision is another example of uncertainties resulting from the principal unresolved Granholm question: How does one reconcile the location-neutrality principle with the infamous North Dakota dictum to the effect that states may discriminate against out-of-state wholesalers? The Fifth Circuit’s answer, like that of the Second Circuit, is that Granholm extended Commerce Clause protection to wineries, but not to wholesalers or retailers, because national markets in the lower tiers would make it impossible for a state to protect the “traditional three-tier system.” As the Court of Appeals judge said about setting aside fundamental economic policy embodied in the dormant Commerce Clause to follow a judicial aside that was not part of the Granholm holding, “That language may be dicta. If so, it is compelling dicta.”

Post-Granholm litigation shows clearly enough that judges, though not bound to follow dicta, will elevate it to persuasive precedent when it coincides with their value systems. The values question is whether states’ asserted 21st Amendment right to maintain a privileged middle tier trumps the Commerce Clause policy against differential treatment of in-state and out-of-state economic interests. All one can say at this point is, “to be continued.”

by R. Corbin Houchins, CorbinCounsel.com

1 Comment

  1. Congratulaions Texas! Score one for less consumer choice and higher prices on wines we don't even want. Bravo!

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>