<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Lone Reciprocal State</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shipcompliantblog.com/blog/2010/08/05/the-lone-reciprocal-state/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shipcompliantblog.com/blog/2010/08/05/the-lone-reciprocal-state/</link>
	<description>Untangling the complex world of wine direct shipping and compliance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 16:58:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The End of Winery Reciprocity? New Mexico Passes Direct Shipping Legislation - ShipCompliant</title>
		<link>http://shipcompliantblog.com/blog/2010/08/05/the-lone-reciprocal-state/comment-page-1/#comment-489494</link>
		<dc:creator>The End of Winery Reciprocity? New Mexico Passes Direct Shipping Legislation - ShipCompliant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2011 00:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shipcompliantblog.com/blog/?p=710#comment-489494</guid>
		<description>[...] Mexico will be the last state to change from reciprocity to permit status for winery shipping since it was the last state that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mexico will be the last state to change from reciprocity to permit status for winery shipping since it was the last state that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wine-Know</title>
		<link>http://shipcompliantblog.com/blog/2010/08/05/the-lone-reciprocal-state/comment-page-1/#comment-290998</link>
		<dc:creator>Wine-Know</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 15:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shipcompliantblog.com/blog/?p=710#comment-290998</guid>
		<description>Then there&#039;s Maryland, where it is a FELONY to ship wine into, within, or out of the state! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then there&#039;s Maryland, where it is a FELONY to ship wine into, within, or out of the state! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Wark</title>
		<link>http://shipcompliantblog.com/blog/2010/08/05/the-lone-reciprocal-state/comment-page-1/#comment-290004</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Wark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 16:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shipcompliantblog.com/blog/?p=710#comment-290004</guid>
		<description>To answer your pop quiz: Technically, No. Under H.R. 5034 anyone could still bring a legal action against a discriminatory state law. However, if they did, they&#039;d be wasting their money on lawyers as the challenged would fail miserably.  
 
Tom Wark 
Specialty Wine Retailers Association </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To answer your pop quiz: Technically, No. Under H.R. 5034 anyone could still bring a legal action against a discriminatory state law. However, if they did, they&#039;d be wasting their money on lawyers as the challenged would fail miserably.  </p>
<p>Tom Wark<br />
Specialty Wine Retailers Association </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
