<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Step in the Right Direction: Florida Offers Online Label Registration and Quick Approval Times</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shipcompliantblog.com/blog/2010/10/21/a-step-in-the-right-direction-florida-offers-online-label-registration-and-quick-approval-times/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shipcompliantblog.com/blog/2010/10/21/a-step-in-the-right-direction-florida-offers-online-label-registration-and-quick-approval-times/</link>
	<description>Untangling the complex world of wine direct shipping and compliance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 16:58:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://shipcompliantblog.com/blog/2010/10/21/a-step-in-the-right-direction-florida-offers-online-label-registration-and-quick-approval-times/comment-page-1/#comment-345464</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shipcompliantblog.com/blog/?p=757#comment-345464</guid>
		<description>Not sure I agree about the California licensing fee or process to be complicated.  ABC does a pretty good job, in my estimation at giving people a specific set of rules and guidelines as well as a way to receive a permit.  Florida is also really difficult to deal with if you&#039;re not a winery. 
 
Ok, so maybe California isn&#039;t perfect and you&#039;d prefer the fees to be cheaper (wouldn&#039;t we all?)....why not compare to say Pennsylvania which is a complete and utter mess. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure I agree about the California licensing fee or process to be complicated.  ABC does a pretty good job, in my estimation at giving people a specific set of rules and guidelines as well as a way to receive a permit.  Florida is also really difficult to deal with if you&#039;re not a winery. </p>
<p>Ok, so maybe California isn&#039;t perfect and you&#039;d prefer the fees to be cheaper (wouldn&#039;t we all?)&#8230;.why not compare to say Pennsylvania which is a complete and utter mess. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Grumpy Winemaker</title>
		<link>http://shipcompliantblog.com/blog/2010/10/21/a-step-in-the-right-direction-florida-offers-online-label-registration-and-quick-approval-times/comment-page-1/#comment-344244</link>
		<dc:creator>The Grumpy Winemaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 02:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shipcompliantblog.com/blog/?p=757#comment-344244</guid>
		<description>Florida is the only state with a sane shipping law. We ship, we comply and pay the tax. I wish California could take a cue - $10 license fee, $500 in a California bank for 3 years, pay local sales tax for point of shipping. Monthly filing. They are not the model. Florida is. There is also the nightmare that if you comply with all these requirements that you are subject to California State income minimum tax of $800. What a model state. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Florida is the only state with a sane shipping law. We ship, we comply and pay the tax. I wish California could take a cue &#8211; $10 license fee, $500 in a California bank for 3 years, pay local sales tax for point of shipping. Monthly filing. They are not the model. Florida is. There is also the nightmare that if you comply with all these requirements that you are subject to California State income minimum tax of $800. What a model state. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
