viagra senza ricetta in svizzera dove acquistare levitra mg viagra apotek achat viagra par pharmacie belge viagra ilman reseptiä comprar kamagra soft sites viagra fiables cialis ficha tecnica viagra generico prezzi bassi viagra bij vrouwen comprar levitra generico online viagra en mallorca viagra indien erfahrungen venta viagra online acheter du viagra forum
levitra g c an c arique viagra a petit prix viagra ordonnance france vente de cialis prix viagra france commander viagra ligne delai rapide pour livraison viagra achat kamagra commander viagra en france viagra generico cialis sur ordonnance acheter viagra sur sildenafil citrate mg cialis ou viagra achat levitra moins cher

Is the Marketplace Fairness Act Fair for Wineries?


In short, yes, for a couple of reasons:

1. Wineries already pay sales tax in most states
2. The vast majority of wineries will likely be exempt from the law

So what is it, exactly?

Senate Bill S. 743, more commonly known as the “Marketplace Fairness Act“, is a pretty simple bill that would give states the ability to require out of state businesses that have “remote sales” in excess of $1 million annually to remit sales taxes. Each state would be able to opt in to the Act, but only after they have simplified their tax structure, either by joining the Streamlined Sales and Use Tax Agreement or to follow the steps outlined in the bill to simplify their sales tax requirements.

Will it pass?

With broad bi-partisan support, S. 743 passed out of the Senate with a vote of 69 to 27. However, a tough battle is expected in the House, and therefore the Marketplace Fairness Act has a long way to go before it is enacted with a signature from President Obama. Amazon.com is supporting the bill (presumably because they would like to move forward with their plans to build warehouses in each state to support same-day shipping), while eBay is one of the main voices in opposition.

What will it mean for wineries?

A lot hinges on the definition of “remote sales”. Keep in mind the fact that state legislation to allow wine shipments typically includes a provision that also requires wineries to register for and pay sales tax. As it stands in the Senate version, and based on our interpretation of the current language, sales by wineries to states where they are already required to pay sales tax would not be counted when considering the $1 million threshold for remote sales.

Based on some quick analysis, there are a few hundred wineries in the US that ship more than $1 million worth of wine to consumers each year. BUT, if you include sales only to those states (Alaska, Colorado, D.C., Florida, Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, New Hampshire, Oregon, and Wyoming) that do not require wineries to pay sales tax, then we estimate that less than 25 wineries would exceed the $1 million cap. In other words, the vast majority of the 7,000+ wineries in the US would be exempt from this law.

Wineries are already accustomed to calculating, collecting, and remitting sales taxes in most states. So, for those wineries that would not be exempt from this law, it would probably not be that big of a deal to add a few more states (initially the states of Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, and Wyoming) to the list of states to which they would be required to remit sales tax. They already have the technology and processes to do so.

The bill would take effect, at the earliest, on October 1st, 2013. Once effective, the 22 “Streamlined” sales tax states would begin requiring sales tax for remote sellers with over $1 million in sales. After that, each of the remaining 28 states would choose whether to opt in to the Act and start requiring sales tax from remote sellers.

1 Comment

  1. hi Jeff – I’m confused about a few things…

    1. Is the $1M exemption based on total sales summed from all 49 states other than my own, or is that per state?

    2. I currently collect and pay sales tax for orders I ship to – for example – Washington state. If this bill passes, and if the $1M exemption applies to me, will I no longer have to collect and pay sales taxes for WA? In other words, does this supersede the direct shipping regs?

    3. I am also confused by the “Streamlined Sales Tax” thing. According to your chart WA is currently an SST state. I currently do the filing quarterly and I am required to file it online. The WA filing is one of the most annoying and difficult filings I do. The form requires me to report income from every little special municipality in the state (it seems like over 100) in order to calculate my total tax (which thankfully you do the separation but I still do the data entry). This seems like the antithesis of “streamlined” to me and I thought the whole point was that out of state retailers would not have to deal with details like this.

    Thanks! – jeff

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>