Untangling the complex world of wine direct shipping and compliance
  • stromectol pharmacie acquistare methotrexate on line tetracycline compresse clomiphene pharmacie furacin acquisto acquistare avodart on line atarax pharmacie priligy prezzo neoral generico antabuse acquisto
  • pentasa sur le comptoir commande zyban loperamide prix zovirax sur le comptoir spironolactone vente pantoprazole mg acheter methotrexate en ligne commande priligy nexium vente ibuprofen prix

    Posts from the Kentucky Category

    Kentucky Election Day Bill Creates New License for Out-of-State Wine and Spirits Suppliers

    By Jessamyn Boltz - ShipCompliant Research Team

    All out-of-state wine and distilled spirits suppliers that sell to Kentucky distributors are now required to obtain an “Out-of-State Distilled Spirits/Wine Producer/Supplier License” following the passage of SB 13 in April. Before this bill became effective on June 25, 2013, suppliers still needed to register their brands with the ABC prior to selling to Kentucky [...]

    July 18th, 2013

    Is the Marketplace Fairness Act Fair for Wineries?

    By Jeff Carroll - VP of Compliance, ShipCompliant

    In short, yes, for a couple of reasons: 1. Wineries already pay sales tax in most states 2. The vast majority of wineries will likely be exempt from the law So what is it, exactly? Senate Bill S. 743, more commonly known as the “Marketplace Fairness Act“, is a pretty simple bill that would give [...]

    May 7th, 2013

    Notes on Wine Distribution v.32

    By Jeff Carroll - VP of Compliance, ShipCompliant

    The latest version of “Notes on Wine Distribution”, by R. Corbin Houchins, is now available. Release 32 includes updates on legislation, litigation and general discussions on available distribution channels for wine. This release includes substantial changes, including new sections on age and identity, facial neutrality, and logistical support services, as well as updates to state [...]

    February 4th, 2010

    Kentucky On-Site Requirement Invalidated, but Questions Remain

    By Jeff Carroll - VP of Compliance, ShipCompliant

    On December 24th, the US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit affirmed, in the Cherry Hill case, the judgment of the district court, invalidating the on-site purchase requirement. The district court ruled, pursuant to the Supreme Court’s decision in Granholm v. Heald, 544 U.S. 460 (2005), that the in-person purchase requirement in portions of [...]

    December 31st, 2008

    Caps Off to Dolan's Intentions

    By Sarah Werner - ShipCompliant Research Team

    In October of last year, wineries began shipping directly to Ohio residents under a new direct shipping permit law. When the provisions of the law in Ohio were first announced, one of the major subjects of controversy was the capacity cap, which only allows wineries that produce less than 150,000 gallons annually to obtain a [...]

    April 11th, 2008