<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for ShipCompliant: Wine Shipping Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shipcompliantblog.com/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shipcompliantblog.com/blog</link>
	<description>Untangling the complex world of wine direct shipping and compliance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 15:06:00 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Wine Freedom in the South? Tennessee Direct Shipping Bill Passes the Senate by Steve A</title>
		<link>http://shipcompliantblog.com/blog/2009/04/27/wine-freedom-in-the-south-tennessee-direct-shipping-bill-passes-the-senate/comment-page-1/#comment-251352</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 15:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shipcompliantblog.com/blog/?p=390#comment-251352</guid>
		<description>Souds great, but thanks to our lovely states &quot;red tape process&quot;, GOOD LUCK trying to find anyone willing to ship. I purchased two cases last year and now even the company that was previously willing now refuses to ship. THANKS FOR NOTHING. Guess we will have to continue to drive over state lines to get decent pricing and selection for our wine. 
&quot;Tennessee sounds good to me&quot; I don&#039;t think so. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Souds great, but thanks to our lovely states &quot;red tape process&quot;, GOOD LUCK trying to find anyone willing to ship. I purchased two cases last year and now even the company that was previously willing now refuses to ship. THANKS FOR NOTHING. Guess we will have to continue to drive over state lines to get decent pricing and selection for our wine.<br />
&quot;Tennessee sounds good to me&quot; I don&#039;t think so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Next Steps in Direct Shipping: Refining State Laws by Bill Cooper</title>
		<link>http://shipcompliantblog.com/blog/2010/02/15/next-steps-in-direct-shipping-refining-state-laws/comment-page-1/#comment-250486</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Cooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 18:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shipcompliantblog.com/blog/?p=612#comment-250486</guid>
		<description>At the top of your list, I would put revision of bond requirements to something that makes sense as I find requiring a $1,000 bond to make sure I pay the taxes that I self-assess a bit strange, and expensive. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the top of your list, I would put revision of bond requirements to something that makes sense as I find requiring a $1,000 bond to make sure I pay the taxes that I self-assess a bit strange, and expensive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Next Steps in Direct Shipping: Refining State Laws by NEWSFETCH - February 17, 2010 &#124; Wine Industry Insight</title>
		<link>http://shipcompliantblog.com/blog/2010/02/15/next-steps-in-direct-shipping-refining-state-laws/comment-page-1/#comment-250479</link>
		<dc:creator>NEWSFETCH - February 17, 2010 &#124; Wine Industry Insight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 17:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shipcompliantblog.com/blog/?p=612#comment-250479</guid>
		<description>[...] Next Steps in Direct Shipping: Refining State Laws [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Next Steps in Direct Shipping: Refining State Laws [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Notes on Wine Distribution v.32 by Sarah Werner</title>
		<link>http://shipcompliantblog.com/blog/2010/02/04/notes-on-wine-distribution-v-32/comment-page-1/#comment-250473</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Werner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 16:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shipcompliantblog.com/blog/?p=609#comment-250473</guid>
		<description>Yes, that&#039;s true.  Page 47 of v.32 of the Notes on Wine Distribution describes this allowance in further detail. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, that&#039;s true.  Page 47 of v.32 of the Notes on Wine Distribution describes this allowance in further detail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Next Steps in Direct Shipping: Refining State Laws by Peg Connor</title>
		<link>http://shipcompliantblog.com/blog/2010/02/15/next-steps-in-direct-shipping-refining-state-laws/comment-page-1/#comment-250211</link>
		<dc:creator>Peg Connor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 04:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shipcompliantblog.com/blog/?p=612#comment-250211</guid>
		<description>Cary,

Amen to that.  How can we mobilize this effort?  As a resident of Pennsylvania, I fully expect that we will be the last state to make any changes.  However, as you mentioned, states look to each other...the more that make the leap to more sensible practices, the sooner that PA will become the last state to adopt them.  I&#039;d like to know how we can get this grassroots movement mobilized...an thoughts?

Thanks for this educational article...look forward to more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cary,</p>
<p>Amen to that.  How can we mobilize this effort?  As a resident of Pennsylvania, I fully expect that we will be the last state to make any changes.  However, as you mentioned, states look to each other&#8230;the more that make the leap to more sensible practices, the sooner that PA will become the last state to adopt them.  I&#8217;d like to know how we can get this grassroots movement mobilized&#8230;an thoughts?</p>
<p>Thanks for this educational article&#8230;look forward to more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Notes on Wine Distribution v.32 by John</title>
		<link>http://shipcompliantblog.com/blog/2010/02/04/notes-on-wine-distribution-v-32/comment-page-1/#comment-250087</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 14:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shipcompliantblog.com/blog/?p=609#comment-250087</guid>
		<description>Tennessee now allows wine shipments as long as the winery has a TN state license. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tennessee now allows wine shipments as long as the winery has a TN state license.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Siesta&#8217;s Over by Bill</title>
		<link>http://shipcompliantblog.com/blog/2010/01/27/siestas-over/comment-page-1/#comment-246198</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 22:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shipcompliantblog.com/blog/?p=597#comment-246198</guid>
		<description>Congratulaions Texas! Score one for less consumer choice and higher prices on wines we don&#039;t even want.  Bravo! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulaions Texas! Score one for less consumer choice and higher prices on wines we don&#039;t even want.  Bravo!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on High Fives in the First Circuit by Sarah Werner</title>
		<link>http://shipcompliantblog.com/blog/2010/01/26/high-fives-in-the-first-circuit/comment-page-1/#comment-246003</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Werner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 20:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shipcompliantblog.com/blog/?p=591#comment-246003</guid>
		<description>Please reference our most recent post on Siesta Village Market decision, here: &lt;a href=&quot;http://shipcompliantblog.com/blog/2010/01/27/siestas-over/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://shipcompliantblog.com/blog/2010/01/27/sies...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please reference our most recent post on Siesta Village Market decision, here: <a href="http://shipcompliantblog.com/blog/2010/01/27/siestas-over/" target="_blank"></a><a href="http://shipcompliantblog.com/blog/2010/01/27/sies.." rel="nofollow">http://shipcompliantblog.com/blog/2010/01/27/sies..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on High Fives in the First Circuit by TBS</title>
		<link>http://shipcompliantblog.com/blog/2010/01/26/high-fives-in-the-first-circuit/comment-page-1/#comment-245995</link>
		<dc:creator>TBS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shipcompliantblog.com/blog/?p=591#comment-245995</guid>
		<description>How does the recent Fifth Court decision affect this discussion? 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.winebusiness.com/news/?go=getArticle&amp;dataid=70868&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.winebusiness.com/news/?go=getArticle&amp;a...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does the recent Fifth Court decision affect this discussion?<br />
<a href="http://www.winebusiness.com/news/?go=getArticle&amp;dataid=70868" target="_blank"></a><a href="http://www.winebusiness.com/news/?go=getArticle&#038;a.." rel="nofollow">http://www.winebusiness.com/news/?go=getArticle&#038;a..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Huge win for wineries, but can I ship to Massachusetts now? by High Fives in the First Circuit - ShipCompliant</title>
		<link>http://shipcompliantblog.com/blog/2010/01/17/huge-win-for-wineries-but-can-i-ship-to-massachusetts-now/comment-page-1/#comment-245843</link>
		<dc:creator>High Fives in the First Circuit - ShipCompliant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 21:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shipcompliantblog.com/blog/?p=588#comment-245843</guid>
		<description>[...] of California v. Jenkins, invalidating the Massachusetts “volume cap.” (see previous post “Huge win for wineries, but can I ship to Massachusetts now?” [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of California v. Jenkins, invalidating the Massachusetts “volume cap.” (see previous post “Huge win for wineries, but can I ship to Massachusetts now?” [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
